Americans need to wake up and demand the truth! We have the right to know! Please read the following...
Taitz demands Holder commence Quo Warranto against Obamapost and email | Dec. 14, 2009 | John Charlton Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:00:23 AM by opentalk(Dec. 14, 2009) —
Without a doubt the most important and significant legal action in the United States this week, is Dr. Orly Taitz's Letter to Eric Holder, sent today, demanding that he institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama in the District Court of Washington, D.C.. The importance of this letter is the fact that the quo warranto provisions of the District of Columbia Code provide that a 3rd party may institute a quo warranto action if the U.S. Attorney General fails to respond within 3 months to his request.
Dr. Orly Taitz wrote Holder on March 1st. In her letter, published today at her website, she demands that either he take action himself, or that her plaintiffs be granted ex-relator status to proceed in the name of the United States of America, as the D.C. code allows. Quo warranto is a legal action whereby a plaintiff formally demands proof that the holder of an office, holds it lawfully, and if he does not, is empowered by the court to remove him from it. The Code of the Disctrict of Columbia contains provisions for quo warranto, in such cases as the usurpation of any federal office exercised within the district. Quo warranto can be used against Barack Hussein Obama because he is not a natural born citizen, and thus does not enjoy the Constitutional immunities of that office.
Dr. Taitz's letter reads in full:
Dear Mr. Holder,
On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.
The request was filed due to following troubling facts:
1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.
2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.
3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obama's short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.
4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates( currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.
5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of Hawaii and all the other vital records.
6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated
7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.
8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr.. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.
Signed,
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
2 comments:
So maybe the Brit, Neil Sankey can succeed where the Russian immigrant (from the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic) has failed, bring it on.
Poor little Birthers (still in denial about their losses), Judge Land and now judge Carter, smack down the crazies (case dismissed).
Not even “Fake News” Glenn Beck or Bill O’Reilly believes the crazies, how funny.
http://trueslant.com/erikkain/2010/01/05/glenn-beck-mocks-the-birthers/
http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/29/bill-oreilly-slams-orly-taitz/
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHER%20CASE%20LIST.pdf
To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true (TOUGH WHEN YOU KEEP LOSING CASES), if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it.
In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”.
I wonder if she is a mail order bride, just like her law degree? She is perfect reporter material for “Fake News”, where unfounded rumors and innuendo reign supreme , unlike a our US courts of law, where you need to present documented facts, not half baked lies (prepare for more failures).
A lawyer, dentist, realtor and black belt, WOW I must say a JACK of all trades master of none
I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Stanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC). She wants to re-establish a family values party.
I can only hope that Taitz will resist the state collectors that will be hounding her like the “ruff ruff” that she is to collect the $20K.
Preston,
You make many assertions about the Republican Party that just show your own bigotry and ignorance. I bet you even think that the Republicans were the ones who burned crosses and wore white hooded capes? You guys are all the same following misinformation that is fed to you by the leftist leaders who have an agenda that you are completely blinded to!
The truth is your dear party that you embrace so tightly, the democrats, FOUNDED and PROPOGATED the KKK and the Republicans were the ones who fought for the liberty and freedom of the black slaves AND were the target of the KKK’s attacks! If you study your History you will find that Republicans were the ones who fought for civil rights from the very beginning, not the Dems. But sometime after the 60s (to be specific, after JFK assisted MLK, Jr. and out of gratitude African Americans began switching over to the democratic party… however MLK, Jr. and his family are republicans, they didn’t abandon the party that granted them freedom) people started forgetting their history and believing lies that the liberal left told and flocking to the left, even though a quick study of history would reveal these lies, but that would have required using your brain and people would rather believe what someone tells them than to take the time to research the truth.
As for the comment "the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate)..." That is where you are VERY wrong. The right is the conservative party and stands for strict interpretation of the constitution that is they are Strict-Constructionists. The right is FOR freedom of religion. They respect all religions and do not force their own on others. Christians are called to share the truth, not force it on people, if that were so we would be the same as Muslims who are called to have different stages of sharing their religion, first they share it peacefully, if the “infidel” does not accept it then they “terrorize him until he believes” and then if that doesn’t work the Qur’an gives the command to “kill the infidel” (that is based on discussions with actual Muslims and a study of the Qur’an, not something I heard on “FakeNews”)… sorry, but that my dear is forcing your religion on people and not at all what you accuse religious republicans of doing. And also it is funny how people like you accuse the right of being close-minded, intolerant, bigots who don’t accept or respect all religions when in fact the exact opposite is true. Christians are punished and NOT accepted by the liberal left. The left claims to be open-minded, tolerant individuals yet, they are close-minded and intolerant when it comes to Christianity. Seems a bit hypocritical to me. You can’t claim to be tolerant and yet remove the right to equal expression from one religion while granting it to others!
As for the proof you demand from aDaughterOfYaHWeH, if the claims weren’t true, then why would Obama have his birth certificate sealed. If he was really running the “transparent administration” he claimed to be running than he would gladly show his birth certificate as PROOF to the American people that he is what he claims to be. It is the RIGHT of the American people to know the truth! He could have avoided all speculation if he had simply allowed his birth certificate to be made available to the American public, but the fact that he had it sealed and gave orders to destroy is enough to raise the suspicions of anyone with half of a brain, not just the “crazies” and conspiracy theorists.
Post a Comment