Saturday, September 15, 2012

What Happened to Freedom of Artistic Expression??

So, I haven't seen this so called film about Muslims that has been the "cause" (honestly it is deeper than a film) of all this violence.... But, while the filmmaker is being demonized, I wonder where all the free-speech and free-expression activists and celebrities are that defended installments like the Crucifix in urine as art and other things that Christians view as blasphemy and so loudly proclaimed it was art and nothing to get offended over ... Where are those people? Because if this video really is the cause of this outbreak of violence, we have a lot of easily offended people in the world who are being stroked and told they have a right to be offended by that mean film. Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in this? Shouldn't artistic liberty apply to all no matter what religious beliefs it offends??? If not, then artistic liberty should be limited when it causes offense to ANY religious belief, INCLUDING Christianity!
One thing about studying art in college. In order to be successful, your art had to basically at the root of it mock Christianity an traditional ideals, had to present the shift in gender roles and lifestyles (homosexuality, lust driven art, etc) as normal and beautiful, present the "glory" and "beauty" of religions like islam and Buddhism and basically had to violate everything a strong fundamental Christian believes in. I won't even describe the pieces I saw constructed or photographed by classmates who were deemed successful artists and the push there was to go down that path if you wanted to truly be a success in the field. I often wondered what the reaction would be if I did similar art of religions I didn't believe in and artistically presented a piece that showed a lack of respect for the people of that religion...... Well, I guess we are seeing the reactions to such a stance artistically in the world today... And we are seeing how there is a blatant double standard.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Close-Minded and Living in the Dark Ages?

The following is a debate which took place on a social network between myself and and a guy named Mike with some input from others... 

aDaughterOfYaHWeH: “It’s not surprising that someone like a Mr. Beck is able to stir up a certain portion of [the American people]. … That’s been true throughout our history,” - Obama ... Really??? I love the implied spin on how it's only the right-wing extremests that Beck appeals to when in reality, if you view things from an unbiased point of view, there is a political shift taking place!

Al Sharpton on GB Show

Restoring Honor

Saturday, August 28, 2010

If you think Liberals stand for Civil Rights, you need a history lesson!

Those of you who think liberals stand for civil rights need a history lesson, you are the product of a progressive era education system that wants to re-write history to match it's ideas and agendas.
I see people who are so ignorant and uneducated that they believe anything they hear from the political news media or with a beer in hand at drunk-chats with equally uneducated individuals, rather than educating themselves by doing research. I become angered when I get accused of being that way, I do not turn to "fox noise" for my knowledge, contrary to popular, liberal belief. I actually stay up to all hours of the night researching through primary documents, not biased second-hand sources, the truth about topics of historical, governmental, and political importance!

The following atricle is actual something I have been passionate about for years, I have done my own research on this topic for many years. I just think this sums up the facts very well, and it saves me the time of typing it myself! I'm tired of watching people live in the dark on the truth of American history! Now is the time to know the truth, let the truth set you free! If you don't believe the following, then DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH... I'm pretty sure you'll actually find that it is true... Even the KKK foundation parts!!!!!


Why Martin Luther King Was Republican by Frances Rice

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.

Ms. Rice is chairman of the National Black Republican Association (NBRA) and may be contacted at

Thursday, August 26, 2010

If You're Reading This

Grab your box of tissues! This is for all the american soldiers past, present, and future who have made a decision to willingly lay down their lives for the freedom and liberty of the weak and innocent! God bless the AMERICAN soldier -- You may spit on his grave and burn the flag he fights for, but it is because of his sacrifice that you have the FREEDOM to do those things! In my opinion we don't care enough about our soldiers! This is a tribute to the American Soldier ... God Bless You All!

Monday, April 5, 2010

10 Amazing Parallels of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Hussein Obama!  

10 Amazing Parallels of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Hussein Obama:  

1. Lincoln placed his hand on a Bible for his inauguration. Obama used the same Bible.    

2. Lincoln came from Illinois . Obama comes from Illinois. 

3. Lincoln  served in the Illinois Legislature. Obama served in the Illinois Legislature.    

4. Lincoln had very little experience before becoming  President. Obama had very little experience before becoming President.    

5. Lincoln rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration. Obama rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration.   

6.   Lincoln was a skinny lawyer. Obama is a skinny lawyer.   

7. Lincoln was a  Republican. Obama is a skinny lawyer.   

8. Lincoln  was highly respected. Obama is a skinny lawyer.   

9. Lincoln was born in the United States . Obama is a skinny lawyer.    

10. Lincoln was honest, so honest he was called Honest Abe. Obama is a skinny lawyer. 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Look How Michelle Spends Our Hard Earned Money! -- You Still Think They Are For The American People?

About Michelle :
Written by Dr. Paul L. Williams
"In my own life in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much," she said. "See, that's why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service, "...Michelle Obama
No, Michele Obama does not get paid to serve as the First Lady and she doesn't perform any official duties. But this hasn't deterred her from hiring an unprecedented number of staffers to cater to her every whim and to satisfy her every request in the midst of the Great Recession.Just think,  Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china for the White House during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salary for her personal secretary from her husband's salary.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Could it be?!?!?

Americans need to wake up and demand the truth! We have the right to know! Please read the following...
Taitz demands Holder commence Quo Warranto against Obamapost and email  | Dec. 14, 2009 | John Charlton Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:00:23 AM by opentalk(Dec. 14, 2009) —
Without a doubt the most important and significant legal action in the United States this week, is Dr. Orly Taitz's Letter to Eric Holder, sent today, demanding that he institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama in the District Court of Washington, D.C.. The importance of this letter is the fact that the quo warranto provisions of the District of Columbia Code provide that a 3rd party may institute a quo warranto action if the U.S. Attorney General fails to respond within 3 months to his request.